XOM has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: XOM’s read rests on 32,598 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; XOM’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
XOMWMBtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +23.1 | +15.5 |
| Evidence | 74 | 63 |
| Quality | 82 | 79 |
| Price | $168.50 | $70.54 |
| Contracts today | 32,598 | 4,155 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948 | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 20% of 1,541 checked | 34% of 261 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.