HAFN has the strongest read; XOM has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: XOM’s read rests on 32,598 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; HAFN’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +51.3 | +23.1 |
| Evidence | 56 | 74 |
| Quality | 65 | 82 |
| Price | $10.24 | $168.50 |
| Contracts today | 791 | 32,598 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.04% · n=83,764 | hasn’t paid −0.82% · n=8,773 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 43% of 324 checked | 20% of 1,541 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
HAFNXOMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.