Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / LOW vs BABA, AMZN, WMT · /stock/LOW?vs=BABA,AMZN,WMT (was /compare/LOW,BABA,AMZN,WMT)

LOW has the strongest read; AMZN has the most behind it.

All four lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; LOW’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
LOW Lowe's Companies · Retail×
BABA Alibaba Group Holding · Retail×
AMZN Amazon.com · Retail×
WMT Walmart · Retail×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+49.1+41.8+32.9+30.2
Evidence 67 88 96 90
Quality80959794
Price$188.85$107.00$254.06$110.43
Contracts today8,30661,270353,705166,855
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h23% of 699 checked28% of 908 checked15% of 2,000 checked30% of 685 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

LOWBABAAMZNWMTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add GMEWhy is AMZN’s record 15%?