Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 18 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/30 names scored today/last score 02:38 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / IWM vs SPY, XLF, XLK · /stock/IWM?vs=SPY,XLF,XLK (was /compare/IWM,SPY,XLF,XLK)

XLK has the strongest read; IWM has the most behind it.

No lean bullish, three bearish. The difference is evidence and record: IWM’s read rests on 412,364 contracts but our 4h record on it is 19%; XLK’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

IWMSPYXLFXLKtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
IWM etf×
SPY etf×
XLF etf×
XLK etf×
The readNeutralMildly bearishMildly bearishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−6.6−19.5−24.5−57.5
Evidence 85 80 79 76
Quality93858484
Price$270.44$776.93$53.62$199.81
Contracts today412,36414,221,662184,520142,801
Calibrationneutral · +0.64% · n=659
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h19% of 2,000 checked3% of 1,123 checked6% of 522 checked8% of 226 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add ARKKWhy is IWM’s record 19%?